Who Rousseau Was
Rousseau: Introduction
Life
- Born in Geneva in 1712.
- Died in 1778.
- Middle-class family. Father was a saddler.
- Received little formal education. Self-taught.
- A figure of the Age of Enlightenment.
- Tutored sons of noblemen for a living.
Emile
- One of the greatest works on developmental psychology.
- Brought Rousseau fame.
- Also got him banished by the Paris Theology Faculty.
His turn in education
- Presented himself as a man of paradoxes.
- Broke from tradition by putting the child at the centre of education.
- Insisted children must be treated as children, not as miniature adults.
Most philosophers of education in the eighteenth century were professional academics. Rousseau was not. He grew up in Geneva, taught himself most of what he knew, drifted across Europe doing odd jobs, and ended up writing books that shaped the way Western societies have raised children for the next two hundred and fifty years. The outsider’s distance from the schoolroom is part of what let him see what others missed.
The life
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in Geneva in 1712. His mother died days after his birth, and he was raised by his father, a saddler, and an aunt. The family was middle-class without being wealthy. Rousseau received only a little formal schooling. Most of what he learned, he learned on his own from books and from travel.
By his teens he had left Geneva. The next twenty years saw him moving through France and Italy, taking jobs as a footman, a music copyist, a private secretary, and eventually a tutor to the sons of noblemen. The tutoring was important: it gave him a close-up view of how wealthy European families educated their children, and the view did not impress him. The children he was hired to teach were being prepared for adult roles long before they were ready for them.
He died in 1778 at the age of sixty-six, after a stroke. By then his reputation was at its height. Emile was on the curriculum of every progressive educator in Europe, even though it had been condemned by the church and burnt in his lifetime.
Born 1712 in Geneva. Middle-class. Saddler’s son. Largely self-taught.
His mother died days after his birth. His father raised him with help from an aunt. Rousseau received little formal schooling; he educated himself through books and travel. By his teens he had left Geneva and was drifting through France and Italy taking odd jobs.
A self-taught genius
Rousseau is often called a self-taught genius of the Age of Enlightenment. Both halves of that label matter.
The self-taught part is the unusual half. The Enlightenment thinkers most readers can name (Voltaire, Diderot, Kant, Hume) had years of formal study at the leading institutions of their day. Rousseau did not. His learning came from reading widely on his own, from writing music, and from years of conversation in the salons of Paris with people who had received the formal education he had not. The result was a thinker who could engage on equal terms with the greatest minds of his century, but who had arrived there by a different route.
The Age of Enlightenment part places him in his time. The Enlightenment was the long European project of using reason to question received tradition and to remake politics, religion, science, and education on rational foundations. Rousseau belonged to this project but was also one of its sharpest critics. He worried that the Enlightenment’s confidence in reason was missing something important about feeling, nature, and the moral life. His criticisms came from inside the movement, which is part of why they stuck.
He educated himself outside the universities yet stood among the leading Enlightenment thinkers
His learning came from reading on his own, writing music, and conversing in Parisian salons with formally educated peers. He belonged to the Enlightenment project of remaking institutions on rational foundations, but he criticised the movement from inside for ignoring feeling, nature, and the moral life.
Emile and the price he paid for it
Emile, or On Education appeared in 1762. It is one of the greatest works on developmental psychology ever written and the book that brought Rousseau lasting fame. It is also the book that got him banished from Paris.
The book is a fictitious account of an educational experiment. A boy named Emile is raised from infancy to early adulthood by a tutor, on principles Rousseau works out in detail. The book reads partly as a novel, partly as a philosophical argument, and partly as a manual for educators. Rousseau used the fictional frame to test ideas that no real parent of his day would have accepted.
The Paris Theology Faculty condemned the book within weeks of its publication. The objection was theological: Rousseau’s account of natural religion clashed with the official Catholic teaching of the day. Copies of Emile were burnt in public, and a warrant was issued for Rousseau’s arrest. He fled France and spent much of the rest of his life as a wanderer, sometimes welcomed in foreign cities, sometimes driven out again.
The banishment did not stop the book. Emile was reprinted across Europe, translated into many languages, and read by every serious educator of the next generation. The price Rousseau paid for writing it was a real cost in his own life. The book outlived the persecution by centuries.
A 1762 novel-treatise about a boy’s upbringing that put the child at the centre of educational thought
The book follows a fictional boy raised by a tutor from infancy to adulthood. It is part novel, part philosophical argument, and part manual. The Paris Theology Faculty condemned it as anti-Catholic and burnt copies in public, but the book was reprinted across Europe and shaped child-centred education for the next two centuries.
A man of paradoxes
Rousseau presented himself as a man of paradoxes. The line is his own, and his readers have repeated it ever since.
The paradoxes are real. He wrote eloquently about the value of family life but abandoned his own five children to a foundling hospital. He praised the simplicity of rural life but spent most of his career in Paris. He advocated free, natural education for boys but a constrained, relative education for girls. He praised honesty but is now known to have rearranged the facts of his own life when convenient. The contradictions are uncomfortable for any reader who wants their philosophers consistent.
The contradictions are also part of why he is read. A purely consistent thinker would have written a system. Rousseau wrote a struggle. The struggle was between what he saw as humanity’s natural goodness and the corrupting force of society as it had developed. He worked the struggle out in many books, from different angles, and the angles did not always line up. Modern readers can hold the contradictions in mind and still learn from each angle separately.
What does not contradict is the central educational claim. Rousseau broke with the traditional system by making the child the centre of the educational process. Before Emile, the standard European view was that the child was a small adult who needed to be filled with adult knowledge and disciplined into adult behaviour. After Emile, this view had to defend itself against a powerful alternative. The alternative is that the child is a developing being whose nature must be respected and whose education must be timed to their stage of growth. Almost every modern educational reform builds on this one claim.
Children must be treated as children, not as miniature adults
Before Emile, the standard European view was that the child was a small adult to be filled with adult knowledge and disciplined into adult behaviour. Rousseau made the child the centre of the educational process and insisted that the child’s nature must be respected and the education timed to the stage of growth. Almost every modern educational reform builds on this claim.
How was this article?