The Developmental Curriculum

The curriculum that follows from Montessori’s developmental theory looks unlike most modern curricula. It is built around what children are actually interested in, varies systematically with the planes of development, and includes a distinctive treatment of imagination, fantasy, and creativity. The article works through what Montessori actually put in her curriculum and the principles that guided her choices.

Curriculum determined by the children

Montessori made numerous changes in the curriculum as her work developed, but the underlying principle that guided the changes is constant. Curriculum ought not to be what adults thought it should be. The curriculum should be based on the interests of individual children, who, on Montessori’s observation, are interested in everything when given the right conditions.

The contrast with conventional curriculum design is sharp. A conventional curriculum is designed by adult educators who decide what children should know, in what order, at what age. The children’s actual interests are subordinated to the adult plan. A Montessori curriculum starts from observation of what children actually engage with and structures the learning to support what the children are already pursuing.

All learning, in Montessori’s design, aims to help and promote the development of the child. This sounds obvious, but its consequences are large. A topic is in the curriculum because engaging with it supports the child’s development, not because some adult committee decided it should be required. The criteria for inclusion are developmental, not traditional.

The fact that children think differently at each plane of development was a major consideration. The curriculum suitable for the absorbent mind (0-6) is qualitatively different from the curriculum suitable for the conscious mind (6-12), which is again different from the curriculum suitable for abstract thinking (12-18). The differences are not just about content; they are about how the content is presented and engaged with.

A striking practical discovery from Montessori’s experimental work was that small children were able to do things far above their expected capacities. The standard expectations for three-year-olds, for example, were much lower than what Montessori’s three-year-olds actually did. She experimented by putting more and more challenging material into the stage 1 (3-6 years) curriculum and discovered that the children readily accepted everything, provided that it was presented in an acceptable manner suited to the child’s psychology.

The result is striking. At three years, Montessori’s children were introduced to all branches of culture: language, mathematics, history, geography, science, art, and music. The breadth would be shocking to most contemporary early-childhood educators, who restrict three-year-olds to a much narrower range. Montessori’s empirical finding is that the breadth works, given the right presentation. Children of three can engage with all branches of human culture if the materials and methods are appropriate to their developmental stage.

A line worth keeping from Montessori on this point: materials are not the curriculum; rather, it is the interest of the children that decides the curriculum. The didactic materials matter, but they are tools serving the curriculum, not the curriculum itself. The curriculum is whatever the children’s interests, given a rich prepared environment, lead them to engage with.

Montessori’s slogan for the underlying principle: we must enlarge the syllabus, thus enlarging the mind. The order is intentional. By expanding what the curriculum offers, the educator expands what the child’s mind can grasp. A narrow curriculum produces a narrow mind; a broad curriculum, well-presented to a child capable of engaging with it, produces a broad mind. The investment is in what the curriculum makes available.

Flashcard

What is Montessori's central principle for curriculum design?

Tap to reveal

Answer

The curriculum is based on the interests of individual children, who are interested in everything; materials are tools, not the curriculum itself

The contrast with conventional curriculum design is sharp. Conventional curricula are designed by adult committees who decide what children should know in what order at what age. Montessori curricula start from observation of what children actually engage with and structure learning to support what the children are already pursuing. At three years, Montessori children are introduced to all branches of culture: language, mathematics, history, geography, science, art, music. The slogan: we must enlarge the syllabus, thus enlarging the mind.

Imagination as a tool

Montessori’s treatment of imagination is one of the most distinctive parts of her account, and it cuts against the sentimental treatment of imagination that many modern early-childhood educators offer. Imagination, in Montessori’s framework, is a serious cognitive capacity, not a vague creative faculty associated with play and pretending.

Imagination, Montessori writes, has a sensory base as well as a solid foundation in sensorial materials. The image of a sensory base matters. The child’s imagination does not appear out of nowhere; it grows out of the sensory experiences the child has actually had. A child who has handled many real objects, observed many real phenomena, and experienced many real situations has a rich storehouse from which their imagination can construct mental imagery and possibilities. A child who has experienced little has little to imagine with.

Imagination is invaluable, in Montessori’s account, for children to learn anything that is not within sight. A child cannot directly experience the moon, the centre of the earth, the inside of an animal’s body, or the depths of the ocean. The child can, through imagination, build mental images of these unseen things that allow them to understand and engage with the topics. Without imagination, the child is restricted to what they can directly perceive. With imagination, the child can extend their understanding far beyond direct perception.

Montessori’s central claim about imagination, the one that distinguishes her position from many others, is that imagination is a tool to discover truth. The claim cuts against the dominant cultural picture that treats imagination as the opposite of reality. Imagination, in Montessori’s account, is the cognitive capacity that lets the mind reach beyond what is currently in front of the senses to grasp what is real but not present. The reach is real; the grasp is real; truth is what the imagination is trying to find.

The importance of imagination follows from this. It is a higher mental function. It helps children develop mentally. It has a role in the creative aspects of science and art alike. The two creative roles are worth distinguishing. Creative imagination in science is extrapolation from truth: the scientist uses imagination to extend known truths into hypotheses about unknown territory, then tests the hypotheses against further evidence. Creative imagination in art is extrapolation from the senses: the artist uses imagination to construct new sensory experiences out of the materials given. Both kinds of creative imagination start from something real and extend it; neither is pure fantasy.

Flashcard

What does Montessori mean by saying *imagination is a tool to discover truth*?

Tap to reveal

Answer

Imagination is the cognitive capacity that lets the mind reach beyond what is in front of the senses to grasp what is real but not present

The claim cuts against the usual treatment of imagination as the opposite of reality. Imagination has a sensory base: a rich storehouse of real experiences gives it material to work with. It is invaluable for understanding anything not within sight: the moon, the centre of the earth, the inside of an animal’s body. Imagination in science extrapolates from truth; imagination in art extrapolates from the senses. Both reach toward something real, not away from it.

Fantasy distinguished from imagination

A crucial Montessori distinction is between imagination and fantasy. The two words are often used interchangeably in everyday English, but Montessori treats them as fundamentally different. The distinction matters for what materials and activities she did and did not include in her curriculum.

Fantasy, in her vocabulary, is the production of mental content that has no foundation in reality. A child imagining a unicorn (something that does not exist) is engaging in fantasy. A child imagining what the moon looks like up close (something that does exist but is not currently in front of them) is engaging in imagination. The distinction is between mental content with a real referent and mental content with no real referent.

Montessori is direct that fantasy must not be confused with imagination. Fantasy, in her view, confuses the child and impedes development. The child whose mental life is filled with fantasy material loses the connection to reality that imagination requires. They cannot use their mental capacity as a tool to discover truth, because the mental capacity has been turned away from truth in the first place.

This commitment shaped what Montessori excluded from her early-childhood curriculum. Fairy tales, fantasy stories, fictional characters who could not exist in the real world were largely absent from the Montessori prepared environment for young children. The exclusion was deliberate. Children at this developmental stage were building the foundation of their grasp of reality, and Montessori thought introducing fantasy material at this stage would interfere with the foundation.

The position has been one of the more controversial parts of Montessori’s framework. Many modern early-childhood educators consider fantasy and pretend play important for development, supporting capacities like theory of mind, narrative thinking, and emotional regulation. Modern research has partially supported this position. The honest reading of Montessori on fantasy is that her concern about fantasy displacing imagination is real and worth taking seriously, but her strict exclusion of fairy tales and fictional content was probably too restrictive. A modern Montessori-influenced teacher might include some fantasy material while being thoughtful about how it relates to the child’s grasp of reality.

Montessori’s treatment of creativity follows the same pattern. Creativity, she writes, is in reality a composition. No one creates artistic products out of nothing. The creative work always uses materials that the creator has previously encountered through their senses; the originality lies in how the materials are combined, not in the materials themselves. The implication for education: to support creativity, give the child rich sensory experience. The sensorial materials Montessori designed were aimed precisely at this: refining the senses for the development of creativity. A child whose senses have been well developed has the rich material from which creative work can be composed.

Flashcard

What is Montessori's distinction between *imagination* and *fantasy*?

Tap to reveal

Answer

Imagination has a real referent (what is real but not currently present); fantasy has no real referent (what does not exist)

A child imagining what the moon looks like up close is using imagination, because the moon exists. A child imagining a unicorn is engaging in fantasy, because unicorns do not. Montessori treats fantasy as confusing the child and impeding development; she excluded fairy tales and fantasy material from her early-childhood curriculum. The position is contested in modern early-childhood education, where fantasy material is often valued. The underlying distinction (imagination as a tool to discover truth) is worth keeping even where the strict exclusion is not.

Flashcard

What does Montessori say about creativity, and how does she think it should be supported?

Tap to reveal

Answer

Creativity is composition: no one creates from nothing; rich sensory experience gives creativity the materials it needs

Creativity, in Montessori’s account, always uses materials that the creator has previously encountered through their senses; the originality lies in how the materials are combined. The implication: support creativity by giving children rich sensory experience. The Montessori sensorial materials were designed precisely for this. A child whose senses have been well developed has the rich material from which creative work can be composed.