Influences and the First Experiment

Montessori’s method did not appear in a vacuum. Three figures shaped her thinking decisively in the years before Casa dei Bambini, and the first experiment in 1907 was designed in light of what she had absorbed from them. The article works through the three influences and the experiment they helped make possible.

Jean Marc Gaspard Itard

The first of Montessori’s three major influences was Jean Marc Gaspard Itard, the French physician famous for his work with Victor, the Wild Boy of Aveyron. Victor was a boy found in a French forest at the end of the eighteenth century, having apparently been raised in isolation from human society. Itard took on Victor’s case and spent years documenting his attempts to bring the boy into human language, behaviour, and social life.

What attracted Montessori to Itard was his scientific and methodical approach to the case. Itard did not approach Victor with a prior theory about what feral children must be like. He observed Victor’s actual behaviour, designed specific interventions to address specific deficits, documented the results in detail, and revised his approach based on the documentation. The case method he developed was foreign to most educational practice of the time, which worked from general theories rather than from specific observations.

Montessori took several specific lessons from Itard. She did not start with theory. She followed the natural tendencies that she observed in children. Just like Itard’s method, she studied each child as an individual case study and kept detailed notes of progress and development. The pattern of intensive individual observation, documented over time, became the foundation of her own research method.

The Victor case also gave Montessori a striking demonstration of how much development is possible even in apparently hopeless cases. Itard never fully succeeded in bringing Victor into normal social life; Victor remained linguistically and socially limited until his death. But the progress Itard did achieve, in a child who had been written off as untreatable, showed what disciplined intervention could accomplish. The implication for Montessori’s later work with disabled children, and ultimately with all children, was direct: even children who look beyond help may not be, if the right method is used.

Flashcard

What did Maria Montessori take from Jean Marc Gaspard Itard's case method?

Tap to reveal

Answer

A scientific approach: do not start with theory, observe natural tendencies, study each child as an individual case with detailed notes on progress

Itard’s work with Victor, the Wild Boy of Aveyron, demonstrated that careful documented observation of an individual child could produce real intervention even in apparently hopeless cases. Montessori took the case-study method and applied it to her own clinical and pedagogical work. The pattern of intensive individual observation, documented over time, became the foundation of her own research. She also took the underlying optimism: even children who look beyond help may not be, if the right method is used.

Édouard Séguin

The second major influence was Édouard Séguin, a nineteenth-century French and American physician who specialised in deaf-mutes and in children classified at the time as mentally retarded. Séguin founded the first school for such children in Paris and went on to develop the educational methods for them that would shape special education for the next century.

Several features of Séguin’s work attracted Montessori. He was an advocate of reconstruction of society based on loving one another. The phrase positions him as a social-reform thinker, not just a medical or educational specialist. He had philosophical commitments to democracy and treated educational work as part of a wider project of building a more just society. Montessori would carry these commitments into her own work.

Séguin’s specific theoretical contribution was his distinction between nature and nurture in child development. Nature, in his vocabulary, meant the individual acting on the environment: the child’s spontaneous activity, what they reach for, what they engage with, what they make of what they encounter. Nurture meant the individual responding to social relationships: how the child develops through interaction with other people, especially the adults responsible for them. Both processes were real, and both mattered, and neither alone was sufficient.

Based on Séguin’s influence, Montessori developed her own concept of moral education. The phrase did not mean moralising or teaching rules of conduct. It meant the deliberate cultivation of the child’s moral capacities through the kind of interaction Séguin’s nurture concept named: respectful, attentive, loving relationships with adults who genuinely wanted the child to develop. The moral education was not a separate subject in the curriculum; it was a quality of the whole educational relationship.

A Modern teacher will recognise some of Séguin’s nature/nurture framing as dated; modern developmental psychology has refined it considerably. The underlying insight (that both individual activity and social relationship matter, and that neither can substitute for the other) survives the refinement and is still central to good educational practice.

Flashcard

What did Montessori take from Édouard Séguin?

Tap to reveal

Answer

The distinction between nature and nurture, and the concept of moral education as the quality of the whole educational relationship

Séguin was a physician of deaf-mutes and founder of the first school for mentally retarded children in Paris, with democratic commitments and a vision of social reform based on loving one another. His framing: nature is the individual acting on the environment; nurture is the individual responding to social relationships. Both matter. From this Montessori developed moral education as the deliberate cultivation of moral capacities through respectful, attentive, loving relationships rather than as a separate curriculum subject.

Giuseppe Sergi

The third major influence was Giuseppe Sergi, an Italian anthropologist whose work on scientific pedagogy attracted Montessori. Sergi believed that scientific pedagogy could lead to the science of forming man: that the deliberate application of scientific methods to the upbringing of children would, over generations, produce a more developed kind of human being.

Sergi based the principles of a new civilisation on education. The line is grand and reflects the early-twentieth-century enthusiasm for science as a force of social transformation. He wanted to establish natural, rational methods of education that would replace the inherited, often arbitrary, methods that European schools had used for centuries. The scientific method, applied to children, could produce both better educated individuals and a better society.

From Sergi, Montessori took the conviction that education was a scientific enterprise rather than just a craft. The implication: educational claims should be testable, methods should be subject to revision based on evidence, and the work should accumulate over time the way other sciences accumulate. She would apply this conviction throughout her career, treating her own work as scientific inquiry into how children actually develop rather than as a fixed doctrine to be defended.

The three influences (Itard, Séguin, Sergi) had a common conclusion: the utmost importance of early-age education. Each, from his own angle, had emphasised what happens in the first years of life. Itard had shown how much could be done with disciplined intervention in early development. Séguin had shown the importance of the social relationships that surround the developing child. Sergi had shown the scientific significance of getting early education right.

Montessori built on the convergence. The years from birth through six (and especially the years from three through six, which the Casa dei Bambini focused on) became the centre of her work. The convictions that grew from her three influences shaped what she would do when she finally had her own school to run.

Flashcard

What did the three Montessori influences (Itard, Séguin, Sergi) have in common?

Tap to reveal

Answer

They all pointed to the utmost importance of early-age education

Each, from his own angle, emphasised what happens in the first years of life. Itard showed how much could be done with disciplined intervention in early development. Séguin showed the importance of the social relationships surrounding the child. Sergi showed the scientific significance of getting early education right. Montessori built on the convergence, focusing especially on the years from three through six. The Casa dei Bambini and her later work both targeted this period.

The first experiment

Casa dei Bambini opened in 1907 in Rome as Montessori’s first experiment. She intended it from the start as a test of her ideas with ordinary children, using the work with atypical children (her clinical experience) as a guide for the new work with typical ones. The expectation was that the methods which had unlocked development in disabled children would, with appropriate adjustments, unlock even more development in children who started from a stronger baseline.

The setup was deliberately minimalist. The school had only a few small tables and chairs along with toys. Forty children between the ages of 3 and 7 were enrolled. One teacher and one assisting teacher were the only adult staff. The approach to the children was no intervention, only observation. The teachers did not lecture, did not impose a curriculum, did not direct the children’s activities. They watched.

The watching was structured. The teachers documented what each child chose to engage with, how long they sustained engagement, what they avoided, what they returned to, how they responded to different materials and to each other. The observation was the research method; the children themselves, through their behaviour, supplied the data that the method would be built from.

Montessori’s stated intention was to keep in touch with the researches of others (she had read Itard, Séguin, Sergi, and many others) but to make herself independent of them. She would proceed without preconceptions of any kind. The phrase is worth taking seriously. She did not arrive at Casa dei Bambini with a fixed theory she wanted to confirm; she arrived prepared to be surprised by what the children actually did when given the right conditions.

She was surprised. The children’s behaviour, when freed from the directive teaching of conventional schools, was strikingly different from what conventional educators would have predicted. The differences would become the core of the Montessori Method.

Flashcard

How was the first Casa dei Bambini set up, and what was Montessori's stated intention?

Tap to reveal

Answer

A minimalist setup of 40 children aged 3-7, two staff, small tables and chairs, toys, with no intervention and only observation

The setup was deliberately minimalist. The approach was no intervention, only observation. Teachers documented what each child chose, how long they engaged, what they avoided, what they returned to. Montessori’s stated intention was to keep in touch with the researches of others but to make herself independent of them, proceeding without preconceptions. She did not arrive with a fixed theory; she was prepared to be surprised by what the children actually did when given the right conditions.