Moral Training as the Highest Aim
Kant: Moral Training
The headline
Kant gave great importance to moral education. The moralisation of humanity was, for him, the highest aim of all education.
Kant’s famous diagnosis of his own age
We live in an age of discipline, culture, and reinforcement, but we are still a long way off from the age of moral training.
How to provide moral training
- Identify possibilities for moral dimension: freedom, immortality, religious fulfilment.
- Formulate the basic principle of the moral relationship of individuals with themselves and with others.
Moral autonomy of the individual
- Subjective morality.
- The moral world inside the person.
- Humanity reflected in the individual.
Kant’s universal-law formula
Act in such a way that the maxims of your will may at all times also serve as the principle of a general law.
Practical requirements
- Early infusion of right and wrong.
- Morality is established when punishment is abolished.
- Treat each person as an end and never as a mere means.
Why moral training is necessary
- To rid humans of evil.
- Essential for character development.
- Subscribes to the cause of peace.
- A way of achieving Kantian Enlightenment.
- Upholds the dignity of humans.
If Kant’s view of education had to be reduced to one sentence, it would be this: education is for moral training, and everything else is preparation for it. The reduction is uncharitable to the rest of his programme, but it captures the priority. Maths, science, and language matter. Moral training matters more.
The moralisation of humanity
Kant placed enormous weight on moral education. He considered the moralisation of humanity to be the highest aim of all education. Not one aim among many. The highest.
This was a sharp position even in Kant’s own time. Many philosophers and most schools treated education as primarily intellectual: pass the knowledge, train the mind, prepare the citizen for adult work. Kant did not deny that these were real aims. He simply put them under a more demanding one. An education that produced a sharp mind and a poor moral life was, in his view, a failure.
The reason is internal to Kant’s whole project. He had argued (in the previous chapter) that what makes humans different from animals is the capacity for reason directed at duty. A school that develops every other capacity except that one is making a category mistake: it is treating humans as if they were just clever animals. To honour the species, the school must aim at the moralisation that defines the species.
The moralisation of humanity
Kant placed moral education above intellectual, vocational, or civic aims. Other aims matter, but they must be ordered under moral training. A school that produces sharp minds and poor moral lives is, in Kant’s view, a failure.
The age of discipline vs the age of moral training
Kant’s diagnosis of his own age cuts deeply.
We live in an age of discipline, culture, and reinforcement, but we are still a long way off from the age of moral training.
He is naming four stages. The first three are real but limited. The fourth is the real goal.
Discipline is the basic shaping of behaviour. The child does what they should because the alternatives have been made costly. Schools, families, and police all rely on discipline to keep order. Discipline is necessary; it is not sufficient.
Culture is the inheritance of the practices, arts, and habits of a community. A cultured person knows how to behave at a wedding, how to speak in a meeting, what to read, how to dress for what occasion. Culture polishes the person; it does not make them moral.
Reinforcement is the deliberate use of consequences to encourage desired behaviour. The child who is praised for sharing learns to share more often. The student who is rewarded for studying studies more. Reinforcement is powerful, but it works on the behaviour, not the principle behind it.
Moral training is the work of shaping the principle itself. The person who has had moral training does what is right because they have grasped the principle of doing right and have made it their own. This is the work Kant says his age has barely begun.
The line is a challenge to any teacher. Most school programmes deliver the first three. The fourth requires more.
Discipline, culture, reinforcement, moral training
Discipline shapes behaviour from the outside.
Culture transmits practices, arts, and habits.
Reinforcement uses consequences to encourage behaviour.
Moral training shapes the principle behind the behaviour.
The fourth is the real goal. His age, he said, was still a long way from reaching it.
How to provide moral training
Kant gives a two-part method for actually delivering moral training.
First, the educator should identify possibilities for the moral dimension in the student’s life. Kant names three areas where this happens: freedom, immortality, and religious fulfilment. The student needs to be helped to see that they are free (their choices matter), that the consequences of their choices reach beyond a single life (immortality, in Kant’s sense, is the deeper persistence of who one is), and that religious or spiritual fulfilment depends on what they choose to do.
Second, the educator should formulate the basic principle of the moral relationship of individual human beings with themselves and with their fellow humans. This is the harder work. The principle has to be stated clearly and made available to the student in a form they can grasp at their stage of development. Different ages need different formulations of the same underlying principle.
Both halves matter. Naming the dimension without providing a principle leaves the student adrift. Providing a principle without naming the dimension leaves the principle dry. The two together give the student something to grasp and something to grasp it with.
Identify dimension, formulate principle
Identify the possibilities for the moral dimension in the student’s life: freedom, immortality, religious fulfilment.
Formulate the basic principle of the moral relationship of the individual with themselves and with others, in a form the student can grasp at their stage.
Moral autonomy
The deepest concept in Kant’s moral education is moral autonomy. The word literally means self-rule: a person who has moral autonomy gives the moral law to themselves rather than receiving it from outside.
Kant unpacks moral autonomy in three pieces.
Subjective morality means the morality is held inside the person, not imposed by an external authority. The person knows the moral law as their own, not as someone else’s command. A child who only obeys because a parent is watching has not yet reached subjective morality.
The moral world means each person carries an inner moral world they are responsible for. Decisions inside that world have weight; the person’s relationship to their own moral life matters morally. The student is not just a behaving body; they have an inner life that the educator should respect and shape.
Humanity reflected in the individual means that each person, in becoming moral, is realising the moral capacity of humanity as such. The individual is not just becoming a good citizen of their country. They are becoming a moral person in the sense that holds for any human being anywhere. The personal moral life mirrors the universal moral capacity.
The person gives the moral law to themselves
The word means self-rule. A morally autonomous person holds the moral law as their own rather than receiving it from outside. Three pieces: subjective morality, an inner moral world, and humanity reflected in the individual.
The universal-law formula
Kant’s most famous moral principle appears in this section as a single sentence.
Act in such a way that the maxims of your will may at all times also serve as the principle of a general law.
This is one version of his categorical imperative. The instruction is to test every proposed action by asking: could the principle behind this action be a general law that everyone follows? If yes, the action is morally acceptable. If no, the action is not.
The test catches a lot. Lying fails because if everyone lied, language would collapse. Stealing fails because if everyone stole, ownership would collapse. Promise-breaking fails because if everyone broke promises, no one would make them in the first place. Each of these acts depends on most people not doing them; making the act universal destroys the conditions that made the act possible.
For moral education, the formula gives the teacher a precise tool. When a student is faced with a moral choice, the teacher can ask: what is the principle of what you are about to do? Could everyone act on that principle? The student’s own reasoning produces the answer.
“Act so the maxims of your will may serve as the principle of a general law”
Test every action: could the principle behind it be a general law everyone follows? If yes, the action is morally acceptable. If no, it is not. Lying, stealing, and promise-breaking all fail this test.
Practical requirements of moral training
After the principle, Kant lists three practical requirements for actual moral training of children.
Early infusion of right and wrong. The basic distinction between right and wrong must be infused early, before bad habits form.
Morality is established when punishment is abolished. This is a striking claim. Punishment shapes behaviour, but it does not produce morality. A person who behaves well only because punishment is threatened has not become moral; they have become afraid. Real morality is reached only when the person acts well without the fear of punishment.
Treat each person as an end and never as a mere means. This is another famous Kantian formula, sometimes called the humanity formula of the categorical imperative. People are not tools. Even when a person serves a useful function (the shopkeeper sells you bread), they are not reducible to that function. They are also a human being with their own life, plans, and dignity, and they must be treated accordingly.
People are not tools
A person serving a useful function (the shopkeeper, the teacher, the labourer) is not reducible to that function. They are also a human being with their own life and dignity. The principle forbids using people purely as instruments for one’s own purposes.
Why moral training is necessary
Kant lists five reasons moral training matters at all. The list is worth knowing for any exam-prep student.
To rid man of evil. Without moral training, evil habits take hold and the person becomes harder to correct.
Essential for character development. Character cannot be built without moral training.
The cause of peace. Peace among individuals and between nations depends on people who have been morally trained. Untrained people produce conflict; trained people can choose otherwise.
A way of achieving Kantian Enlightenment. Enlightenment, in Kant’s sense, requires the courage to use one’s own reason in moral matters. Moral training builds the readiness for that use.
To uphold the dignity of mankind. Each act of moral living preserves the dignity of the species. Each failure of moral training degrades it.
To rid people of evil, build character, secure peace, achieve enlightenment, and uphold human dignity
Five reasons. Untrained people produce conflict, lack character, retreat to evil habits, fall short of enlightenment, and damage the species’ dignity. Trained people can reverse each of these failures.
How was this article?