Formation of Character
Kant: Formation of Character
When it begins
Character formation begins at a younger age. The longer you wait, the harder the work.
What it is based on
Character development should be based on the categorical imperatives (the maxims).
Two kinds of maxims that shape character
- School maxims. Rules the child learns in the school context.
- Life maxims. The deeper rules that hold across all of life.
Strict adherence to:
- Plan (the chosen approach).
- Rules (the agreed standards).
What character includes (beyond a sense of duty)
- Willpower.
- Loyalty.
What kind of character to form
The character of a child, not of a citizen. Adult citizenship grows out of properly formed childhood character; it is not the same as childhood character.
Character is one of the foggiest words in moral education. Many people use it without saying what they mean. Kant is more precise. Character, for him, is built on specific things in a specific way and aimed at a specific kind of person.
Character begins young
Kant’s first point is timing. Character formation begins at a younger age.
This is a practical observation. A child of six is still pliable. The habits and principles that take hold now will set into place and become very hard to change. By the time a young person is twenty, the work of basic character formation has either been done or it has been left undone, and the second case is much harder to recover from.
The implication is unwelcome to many modern schools. A school that thinks character can be added in high school after the basics are covered has misread the timing. The basics and the character are the same work. They have to be done together, from the start.
At a younger age
A young child has fewer competing principles to displace and more openness to careful teaching. By twenty, the work has either been done or it has been left undone. The second case is much harder to recover from.
Built on categorical imperatives
Character development should be based on the categorical imperatives, also called maxims. Character is not separate from maxims; it is what maxims become when they are deeply internalised.
A child who has been taught a maxim (“do not lie to those who depend on you”) and has come to act on it reliably has begun building character. A child who has been taught only behaviour (“do not lie because you will be punished”) has built habit, not character. The categorical imperative is the structural foundation; character is the lived result.
This means a teacher cannot just teach character in the abstract. The teacher must teach specific maxims that the student can grasp and endorse. Character is built one maxim at a time. The pile of maxims, deeply held, is the character.
The categorical imperatives (maxims)
Character is not separate from maxims; it is what maxims become when they are deeply internalised. A teacher must teach specific maxims the student can grasp and endorse. The pile of maxims, deeply held, is the character.
School maxims and life maxims
Kant distinguishes two kinds of maxims that shape character.
School maxims are the rules the child learns in the school context. They are calibrated to the child’s stage of development and the situations they actually face. Do not push other students. Tell the teacher the truth about your homework. Take turns. School maxims are real maxims (the child should understand the reasonableness), but they are starter versions.
Life maxims are the deeper rules that hold across all of life, not just school. Respect the dignity of every person. Tell the truth even when it costs you. Take responsibility for what you do. Life maxims are universal and not bound to a particular context.
The work of moral education is to grow school maxims into life maxims. The school maxim “do not push other students” eventually grows into the life maxim “do not use violence to get what you want.” The school maxim “tell the teacher the truth about your homework” grows into “tell the truth in any situation where truth matters.”
A teacher who only ever teaches school maxims and never helps them grow into life maxims has done half the job. A teacher who tries to teach life maxims to children who do not yet grasp the school versions has skipped a step.
Scope
School maxims are rules calibrated to the child’s stage and the school context (do not push, tell the teacher the truth). Life maxims are universal rules that hold across all of life (do not use violence, tell the truth in any situation). The work is growing the first into the second.
Strict adherence to plan and rules
Kant insists on strict adherence to two things in character formation: the plan and the rules.
A plan is the chosen approach to the work. A teacher might plan a year-long programme on cooperation, with weekly small-group exercises and reflections. The plan is the structure that holds the work together over time.
Rules are the specific standards the plan enforces. Each small-group exercise has clear rules: every member contributes, the contribution gets recorded, the group reflects together at the end.
Strict adherence means following the plan and rules even when it is inconvenient. A child cannot learn that maxims are universal if the teacher abandons them when a parent complains or a student pushes back. The strictness is not for the teacher’s sake. It is so the child experiences a maxim as something that holds.
A teacher who keeps the plan and the rules when it is uncomfortable shows the child what a maxim looks like in adult life. A teacher who bends them whenever pressure comes shows the child that maxims are negotiable.
The plan and the rules
The plan is the chosen approach (e.g., a year-long programme on cooperation). The rules are the specific standards within it. Strict adherence shows the child what a maxim looks like when it is held: it does not bend under pressure.
Willpower and loyalty
Beyond a sense of duty, Kant adds two further qualities that character includes: willpower and loyalty.
Willpower is the capacity to do what one has decided to do, even when the body or the mood pulls in another direction. A child with willpower can resist a small pleasure for a larger principle. A child without willpower may know what is right and still fail to do it when the moment comes.
Loyalty is the steady commitment to people and principles over time. A loyal child does not abandon a friend when the friend becomes inconvenient. A loyal student does not abandon their values when peers pressure them. Loyalty makes the rest of character possible: maxims without loyalty are abandoned at the first cost.
Both qualities have to be built. They do not arrive on their own. A teacher who notices willpower in a small task and praises it deliberately is feeding it. A teacher who points out the loyalty in a small act and names it helps the child see it as their own.
Willpower and loyalty
Willpower is the capacity to do what one has decided to do, even when the body or mood pulls in another direction. Loyalty is steady commitment to people and principles over time. Maxims without loyalty are abandoned at the first cost.
The character of a child, not of a citizen
Kant’s most subtle move in this section is the distinction at the end. We must form in children the character of a child, and not the character of a citizen.
What does this mean? A citizen is an adult, fully formed, ready to act in public life. A child is not yet an adult. The character a child needs is different from the character an adult needs. A child needs habits and maxims appropriate to childhood: honesty with teachers, kindness to siblings, willingness to learn, ability to follow rules. These are not the adult versions of the same virtues; they are the childhood seeds from which the adult virtues will eventually grow.
A teacher who tries to skip this stage, who treats children as small adults and asks them to take on the full adult moral life right away, does damage. The child is not ready. The result is either compliance without understanding (the child fakes adult morality) or rejection (the child refuses the impossible demand).
The correct path is to form the child’s character properly. Adult citizenship grows out of properly formed childhood character. The two are not the same, but the first is the seed of the second.
The two are different developmental stages
A child needs habits and maxims appropriate to childhood: honesty with teachers, kindness to siblings, willingness to learn. These are not adult virtues in small form; they are the seeds from which adult virtues will eventually grow. Skipping the child stage does damage.
How was this article?