How to Home-School and the Pakistani Context
Home-Schooling: Career Prospects
The criticism
Critics argue home-schooled individuals have very limited career prospects.
Mainstreaming
Many home-schooling parents mainstream their children after grade-school education. Many home-schooled children go on to colleges and universities, acquiring formal higher education and becoming market worthy.
University acceptance
More universities now accept applications from home-schooled students; they find these students possess a passion for knowledge, independence, and self-reliance that helps them excel in intellectually challenging programmes.
Other career options
Many career paths do not require a college or university degree; home-schooled individuals can opt for these.
Business
Home-schooled individuals can become successful entrepreneurs; running a business requires skill from experience and understanding rather than formal qualification.
Vocation
Home-schooled children can learn skills for a specific profession alongside traditional curricula and adopt the profession in adult life.
How to Home-School
Flexibility
- Home-schooling is a flexible pedagogical philosophy.
- Parents can choose what approach to take.
- Schools rely heavily on text-based instruction; many other ways exist to acquire knowledge.
Younger children
For younger children, around 9 or 10, the emphasis is on the skills fundamental to further learning: reading and writing, computation, and finding information in books, on the internet, or from individuals.
Formal vs informal
- Two major kinds: those who start formal learning as early as possible, and those who delay formal learning until age 8-10 or older.
Formal learning
Advocates believe very young children can learn far more quickly than expected; delaying instruction deprives them of opportunities to perform at their best.
Informal learning
Advocates believe young children are not physiologically ready for formal learning until 8-10; waiting allows children to gain maturity and logical skills and prevents frustration.
Three Approaches
The Formal Approach (school-at-home)
- Education process the same as school but at home.
- Parent-teacher acts as a traditional classroom teacher during study hours.
- School room at home: a specific room designated as classroom.
- School schedules prescribed for the children.
- Curriculum strictly followed.
- Summer school often incorporated.
- Extra-curricular activities are an important part.
The Eclectic Approach
- A finding what works approach.
- A relaxed form of education.
- Combination of school-at-home and structured unschooling.
- Parents try different methods, discarding what does not work.
- Course books used but with skipping based on interest.
- Schedules often structured but flexible.
- Learner-centred: parent and child discuss curriculum together.
Freeform Learning (unschooling)
- Used by parents who are severe critics of traditional schooling.
- No structured curriculum; develops as days go by based on the learner’s inclinations.
- No structured schedule.
- Every place is a classroom.
- Extra-curricular activities used to drive curricular learning.
- Skill development is a vital part of education when the child shows interest.
The final article on home-schooling works through the practical question of how to actually do it: the three main approaches families take, the career outcomes home-schooled graduates achieve, and the specific legal and cultural context in Pakistan where many of this guide’s readers will be teaching.
Career prospects for home-schooled graduates
A standard criticism of home-schooling is that home-schooled individuals have very limited career prospects. The argument is that without conventional schooling credentials, home-schooled graduates will struggle to access the careers that require those credentials. The criticism deserves a serious answer because the career question matters for many families considering the home-schooling choice.
The empirical record has been more favourable to home-schoolers than the criticism predicted. Many home-schooling parents mainstream their children after their grade school education is complete. The transition can happen at various points: some home-schooled children re-enter conventional schools for high school; others continue home-schooling through high school and then enrol in college or university; others move directly from home-schooling into vocational training or work.
Many home-schooled children do go on to study in colleges and universities. They acquire formal education at the higher level, making them market worthy by conventional measures. The transition from home-schooling to higher education has become smoother over the past few decades as more universities have developed admissions processes that work for home-schooled applicants.
More and more universities now accept applications from home-schooled students. They find these students possess a passion for knowledge, independence, and self-reliance that helps them excel in intellectually challenging programmes. The qualities home-schooling tends to develop (the discipline of self-directed learning, the depth that comes from engaging with topics on one’s own terms) turn out to be valuable in university work. Many universities now actively recruit home-schooled students for these qualities.
Beyond the conventional college path, there are other career options that do not require a college or university degree, and many home-schooled individuals opt for these. Business is one path: home-schooled individuals can become successful entrepreneurs because running a business does not require a credential; it requires skill learned through experience and understanding rather than through formal certification. Vocation in the older sense is another path: home-schooled children can learn skills for a particular profession in addition to the traditional curricula and go on to adopt that profession in their adult lives. Trades, crafts, agriculture, and many other vocations have admitted home-schooled entrants for as long as they have existed.
The cumulative picture is more favourable to home-schooling than the early critics predicted. Home-schooled graduates have, on average, done well in higher education and in adult careers. The fear that home-schooling would produce un-employable adults has not been borne out. The specific outcomes vary across families and individual children, but the broad pattern has been positive enough to remove much of the force from the career-prospects criticism.
More favourable than early critics predicted; many succeed in college and university, business, and skilled vocations
The early criticism predicted home-schooled graduates would have limited careers due to lack of conventional credentials. The empirical record has been more favourable. Many home-schooling parents mainstream their children for higher education or after high school. Universities now accept home-schooled students and value their passion for knowledge, independence, and self-reliance. Beyond college, paths in business and vocational work do not require conventional credentials. The fear of un-employable home-schooled adults has not been borne out.
How to home-school: three approaches
Home-schooling is a flexible pedagogical philosophy. Parents can choose what approach to take while educating their children. The flexibility distinguishes home-schooling from conventional schooling and is part of why families choose it. The three main approaches the previous chapters have introduced (formal/school-at-home, eclectic, and freeform/unschooling) are worth working through in more practical detail.
Since schools rely so heavily on text-based instruction, families tend to forget that there are plenty of other ways to acquire knowledge. A home-schooled child who has not yet learned to read can watch TV and videos, have informed conversations with family members, ask questions, and acutely observe everything surrounding them. The pre-literate child is learning all the time, even without the textbook the school assumes is necessary.
For younger children, those about 9 or 10 years old or less, the emphasis is usually on gaining the skills fundamental to further learning: reading and writing, computation, finding information whether in books, on the internet, or from individuals on a personal basis. Once these foundational skills are in place, the child can pursue many directions; without them, the directions are limited.
There are two major kinds of home-schoolers in their approach to when formal learning should start. The first kind believes in starting formal learning as early as possible. Advocates of formal learning believe that very young children can learn far more quickly and capably than is usually expected of them, and that delaying instruction deprives them of opportunities to perform at their best. A four-year-old who is taught to read can read; a four-year-old who is not taught will not.
The second kind believes that formal learning is best delayed until the child is eight or ten or even older. Advocates of informal learning believe that young children are not physiologically ready for formal learning until age eight to ten. They suggest that waiting allows children to gain the maturity and logical skills necessary for formal work and prevents them from becoming frustrated and discouraged by attempts to handle material they are simply not yet ready to understand. A four-year-old who is pushed into formal reading instruction before they are ready may develop dislike for reading that affects them for years.
Modern research on early childhood does not give a single answer to which approach is right. Different children develop at different rates; some are ready for formal learning earlier and others later. Home-schooling allows the family to match the timing to the child rather than imposing a fixed age on every child.
The three approaches can be summarised briefly.
The formal approach or school-at-home uses the same education process as school, just at home. The parent or parents responsible for the education act as traditional classroom teachers during study hours. Home-schooling parents using this approach often specify a room at home as a classroom, prescribe schedules for their children to follow, strictly follow a school-like curriculum, often incorporate summer school, and treat extra-curricular activities as an important part of the programme.
The eclectic approach is the most common in practice. It is a finding-what-works approach: a more relaxed form of education. It is often a combination of school-at-home and structured unschooling. Parents play around with different teaching methods, discarding the least effective ones and keeping the ones their children respond to favourably. They often follow course books but skip around parts of lesser interest. Schedules are often structured but can be flexible. The approach is learner-centred: the parent and child discuss the curriculum and decide together what needs to be learned.
The freeform learning or unschooling approach is used by parents who are severe critics of traditional schooling. There is a complete lack of structured curriculum; it develops as the days go by, based on the inclinations of the learner. Unschoolers do away with structured schedules entirely, believing that learning can happen at all times. Every place is a classroom: the zoo, the museum, the neighbour’s house, the backyard, the kitchen. Extra-curricular activities like sports and plays are used as means to drive curricular learning. If the child shows interest in developing a particular skill, it becomes a vital part of their education.
The next chapter (Unschooling) covers this approach in detail as a distinct educational philosophy.
Formal (school-at-home), eclectic (finding what works), and freeform (unschooling)
Formal: same as school but at home; designated classroom, schedules, curriculum, sometimes summer school. Eclectic: most common in practice; finding-what-works, combination of structured and unstructured, learner-centred decisions on curriculum. Freeform/unschooling: no structured curriculum or schedule; child’s inclinations drive learning; every place is a classroom. The choice depends on the family’s values, the child’s needs, and the level of structure the parent can sustain.
Education law in Pakistan
The legal context for home-schooling varies sharply across countries; the Pakistani context is worth working through as a specific example.
The constitution of Pakistan provides that free education be given to all children of school-going age. The relevant constitutional language: The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of five to sixteen years in such manner as may be determined by law. The wording comes from Article 25-A, Chapter 1: Fundamental Rights.
The Right to Free and Compulsory Education Bill, passed in 2012, articulated how education should be delivered to children between the ages of 5 and 16. Educationalists argued that provision of compulsory education was a fundamental right of every child and the bill would ensure better education. The bill provides education for all children aged 5-16 in schools established by the federal government and local government in the Islamabad Capital Territory.
Under the bill, every child, regardless of sex, nationality, or race, has a fundamental right to free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school. The bill is intended to signal an official commitment to universal literacy. The implementation, however, is much weaker than the formal commitment suggests; the government does not take much further action to enforce the bill.
On the practical question of quality, the bill aimed to ensure uniform syllabus and curriculum across the country. In practice, provincial syllabuses and curricula vary considerably from the federal version. Private school status is also addressed: no school other than one established by the appropriate government can function after the commencement of the Act without obtaining a certificate of registration. Private institutions are required to reserve 10 per cent of their seats for poor children.
The bill includes penalties for non-compliance. Parents who refuse to send their children to schools can be fined 25,000 rupees and face three months’ imprisonment. People who employ children for labour can be fined 50,000 rupees and face six months’ imprisonment, addressing the child-labour issue alongside the schooling requirement.
The implementation of the bill is, as with much Pakistani legislation, weaker than the formal text. The government does not take much further action to enforce the various provisions, and the rates of universal literacy that the bill aimed at have not been achieved.
Specifically on home-schooling: there is no law regulating home-schooling practices in Pakistan. The constitutional provision for compulsory school attendance, in principle, requires children to attend school. In practice, the lack of enforcement and the lack of any specific home-schooling regulation has left the area ambiguous. Families who home-school in Pakistan operate in this ambiguous legal space, without explicit permission but also without explicit prohibition or enforcement.
A modern Pakistani family considering home-schooling therefore faces a situation different from a Western family considering the same choice. There is no specific legal framework to navigate. There is no registration process. There are no specific requirements for parent qualifications, standardised testing, or record-keeping. The flexibility is, in one sense, advantageous; in another, it provides no clear guidance for families who want to do home-schooling well.
Ambiguous: there is no specific law regulating home-schooling, even though the constitution provides for compulsory school attendance for children aged 5-16
Article 25-A of the Pakistani Constitution provides for free and compulsory education for children aged 5-16. The 2012 Bill articulated how the education should be delivered. But there is no law regulating home-schooling practices in Pakistan. The compulsory attendance provision is weakly enforced. Families who home-school in Pakistan operate in an ambiguous legal space, without explicit permission but also without explicit prohibition or enforcement. The flexibility provides no clear guidance for families who want to do home-schooling well.
How was this article?