The Paideia Proposal
Adler: The Paideia Proposal
What it is
Paideia is the Greek word for education in the sense of a system of broad cultural formation. The Paideia Proposal was an educational manifesto signed in 1982, on behalf of the Paideia Group.
What it proposed
- A reform of K-12 education in the United States.
- A system of liberal education.
- A one-track schooling system (no separate tracks for vocational vs college-bound students).
- Equal educational opportunity despite the inequality of students as individuals and the variation of their home environments.
- Pre-school through grade 12 as the most important educational years.
- Basic schooling made available to all children.
- Introduction of the Socratic method alongside didactic instruction and skills training.
Purpose
A child who completes proper basic schooling should be able to:
- Earn a living in an intelligent and responsible manner.
- Function as an intelligent and responsible citizen.
- Use both of the above to lead an intelligent and responsible life.
- So that all American schoolchildren can earn a good living, enjoy full lives, and contribute to a democratic society.
The threefold objective
- All individuals get the same educational opportunity and must make the most of it.
- Basic schooling turns students into responsible citizens committed to the betterment of society.
- Basic schooling prepares children to earn a living as adults.
Means
To meet these three objectives, the character of basic schooling must be general and liberal.
Lifelong learning
- The purpose of schooling is to prepare children for a lifelong process of learning.
- Schools must encourage students to continue learning after formal schooling ends.
Final objective
After sixty, an individual who has engaged in lifelong learning is fully mature and experienced, ready to make and defend solutions to life’s major problems or to honestly acknowledge that some problems have no satisfactory solutions.
In 1982 Adler put his philosophical commitments into a concrete reform proposal. The Paideia Proposal is what an American school system would look like if Adler’s principles were taken seriously. The article works through what the proposal recommended, the three objectives it aimed at, and the single track of liberal education it insisted on for every child regardless of background.
What Paideia means and what the proposal is
Paideia is the Greek word used for education in the sense of a system of broad cultural formation. The word does not mean schooling in the narrow modern sense. It means the whole process by which a young person is formed into a complete adult, with the intellectual, moral, and cultural depth that adult life requires. Adler chose the word deliberately. His proposal was for an education that aimed at paideia, not just at the transmission of school subjects.
The Paideia Proposal itself was an educational manifesto signed in 1982 on behalf of a group of educators and writers who called themselves the Paideia Group. The document called for a deep reform of K-12 education in the United States. The reform had several connected elements.
A system of liberal education meant that every child should receive an education in the liberal arts: the arts of learning that develop the mind itself rather than train it for one specific job. This was not an option for some children; it was the right of every child.
A one-track system meant that there would be no separation of students into a college-bound academic track and a vocational track. Every student would receive the same general liberal education, regardless of what they planned to do afterwards. This is one of the proposal’s most radical features in the American context. American schooling had developed elaborate tracking systems that effectively assigned different futures to different children based on early assessments. Adler proposed abolishing the tracking and giving every child the same foundation.
Equal educational opportunity despite the inequality of students as individuals and their varying home environments. The proposal was clear-eyed about the differences children brought into the school. Children arrived with different abilities, different family backgrounds, different levels of preparation. The proposal did not pretend these differences did not exist. Its claim was that the same rigorous liberal education was the right of every child, and that the school’s job was to deliver that education to all of them regardless of the differences in starting position.
The proposal identified pre-school through grade 12 as the most important educational years. This is where the foundation of the lifelong educational process would be laid. The proposal therefore called for basic schooling to be made available to all children, with no child excluded by cost, location, or background.
A practical innovation was the introduction of the Socratic method alongside the didactic instruction and skills training that schools already used. The Socratic method, working through questions in discussion, was the way Adler himself had learned philosophy. The proposal called for it to become a regular part of K-12 schooling for every student.
One-track liberal education for every child from pre-K through grade 12, with the Socratic method added
A system of liberal education available to all children; no separation into academic and vocational tracks; equal opportunity despite differences in starting position; pre-K through grade 12 treated as the most important years; basic schooling made available to all; the Socratic method introduced alongside didactic instruction and skills training. The proposal was a manifesto signed in 1982 on behalf of the Paideia Group.
The purpose of basic schooling
The Paideia Proposal states the purpose of basic schooling in three connected outcomes that every child should be able to achieve by the end of grade 12.
The child should be able to earn a living in an intelligent and responsible manner. This is the vocational outcome, and the proposal does not dismiss it. A graduate needs to be able to support themselves through work. The qualifier is important: intelligently and responsibly. The proposal is not training people for any job that pays. It is preparing them to choose work thoughtfully and to do it well.
The child should be able to function as an intelligent and responsible citizen. This is the civic outcome. Democracy requires citizens who can think clearly about political questions and act responsibly on the basis of their thinking. A school that produces graduates who cannot do this has failed in its civic mission, even if it has met its academic targets.
The child should be able to use both of these to lead an intelligent and responsible life. This is the moral outcome. A person who works well and votes well but lives a life with no integrity has met two-thirds of the goal and missed the third. The proposal puts the three together because they belong together: work, citizenship, and the wider life are connected and must develop together.
The final summary statement makes the population scope explicit: the proposal aims to educate all American schoolchildren so they can earn a good living, enjoy full lives, and contribute to a democratic society. All means all. The reach is universal. The proposal accepts no exceptions for students who are written off as not capable of receiving the full education. The proposal’s underlying conviction is the one Adler stated in his famous line: the underestimation of human intelligence is the worst sin of our time. The Paideia Proposal is the institutional working-out of that conviction.
Earn a living, function as a citizen, and lead a full life, all intelligently and responsibly
The vocational outcome: the child should be able to support themselves through work, chosen thoughtfully and done well. The civic outcome: the child should be able to think clearly about political questions and act responsibly. The moral outcome: the child should be able to use both of these to lead a life of integrity. The three outcomes belong together because work, citizenship, and the wider life are connected.
The threefold objective and the means
The proposal then states a more compressed version of the same outcomes as a threefold objective of basic schooling.
First, all individuals are given the same educational opportunity and must therefore make the most of it. The opportunity side comes from the system; the using side comes from the student. The school provides; the student takes up.
Second, basic schooling must aim at turning students into responsible citizens committed to the betterment of society. The civic mission is explicit. The graduate is not just a worker or a private person; they are a citizen, and the citizenship is active rather than passive.
Third, basic schooling must prepare children to earn a living when they are grown up. The vocational mission is included but is not the only mission and is not the most important one. It comes third in Adler’s list because the other two come first.
The means by which these objectives are met is direct: the character of basic schooling must be general and liberal. Specialised vocational training does not meet the objectives, because it produces specialists who never become generally educated. Narrow technical schooling does not meet them either, because it leaves the civic and moral capacities undeveloped. Only a general liberal education can meet all three objectives at once.
The purpose of schooling, according to Adler, is to prepare children for a lifelong process of learning. Schools must therefore encourage students to continue their education long after formal schooling ends. The school’s mission is not to install a complete adult education in twelve years (impossible) but to lay a foundation strong enough to support fifty years of further learning after.
The final objective is the long-term one. After the age of sixty, an individual who has engaged in the lifelong learning process is expected to be fully mature and experienced. They are ready to make and defend solutions to life’s major problems, or to acknowledge honestly that some problems have no satisfactory solutions. This is the point at which the basic schooling has paid off. The years between graduation and sixty are the long working-out of the educational foundation, and the result is a wise mature adult who can take on the hard questions of human life.
Equal opportunity to be used, responsible citizens committed to society, and preparation to earn a living
(1) All individuals get the same opportunity and must make the most of it. (2) Schooling aims at turning students into responsible citizens committed to society’s betterment. (3) Schooling prepares children to earn a living as adults. The means is general and liberal education; specialised vocational training cannot meet the three objectives.
How was this article?