Skip to content

Communication Skills for Discussion

📝 Cheat Sheet

Four Communication Skills

  1. Paraphrasing
  2. Behavior description
  3. Feeling description
  4. Impression checking

Why all four matter

  1. Paraphrasing: shows you understood
  2. Behavior description: replaces vague labels with specifics
  3. Feeling description: communicates emotions productively
  4. Impression checking: verifies others’ feelings

How they support discussion

  1. Discussion requires give-and-take
  2. Misunderstandings derail discussion
  3. These skills prevent and fix misunderstandings
  4. Teaching them is part of teaching discussion

One of those goals is communication skills development.

A teacher who explicitly teaches these skills builds students’ capacity for discussion. A teacher who assumes students already have these skills often finds discussions falling short.

Why these skills matter

Discussion improves when students understand each other and have regard for each other. Both require communication skills.

Four specific skills:

  1. Paraphrasing.
  2. Behavior description.
  3. Feeling description.
  4. Impression checking.

Each addresses a specific challenge in discussion.

Skill 1: Paraphrasing

Paraphrasing is restating what someone said in your own words.

What paraphrasing demonstrates

When you paraphrase, you show that you understood. The original speaker can verify whether you got it right.

Paraphrasing a poem: read the poem, understand it, write its meaning in plain prose. Not the exact words, but the same meaning.

Paraphrasing in discussion

In discussion, paraphrasing checks understanding:

The original speaker said “this food is very good.” That is broad. Paraphrasing breaks it down: “Are you saying it tastes good? Smells good? Has good ingredients?”

This paraphrasing forces specificity. The speaker clarifies. The discussion deepens.

Same pattern. Vague statement (“you liked it”). Paraphrase to specifics (“you liked the plot? The characters?”).

Why paraphrasing helps discussion

Without paraphrasing:

  1. Vague statements pass without challenge.
  2. Misunderstandings persist.
  3. Discussion drifts.

With paraphrasing:

  1. Statements get clarified.
  2. Misunderstandings get caught.
  3. Discussion deepens.

A teacher who teaches paraphrasing trains students to listen actively and check understanding. A teacher who skips this skill produces discussions where students often misunderstand each other.

How to teach paraphrasing

1. Model it. When students speak vaguely, paraphrase aloud: “Let me see if I understand. Are you saying..?”

2. Practice it. Have students paraphrase what others said before responding. “First, paraphrase Iqbal’s idea. Then say your own idea.”

3. Reinforce it. When students paraphrase well, recognize it. “Excellent paraphrase. Sara understood Tariq’s idea clearly.”

Over time, paraphrasing becomes habitual. Students do it automatically.

Skill 2: Behavior description

Behavior description is observing and describing specific actions, not labeling people.

The problem with labels

“Good children.” “Not good.” “Well mannered.” “Not well mannered.”

These are labels. They evaluate without describing.

Vague labels are not communication. They are judgments without information.

Better description

Specific behavior description:

Specific descriptions: “good in Urdu.” “Knows mathematics concepts.” “Constructs sentences.” “Nails cut.” “Hair tied.”

These are observable behaviors. They describe rather than judge. They give actual information.

Behavior description in discussion

In discussion, behavior description applies when students discuss other students or claims:

Vague: “Hina is rude.”

Behavior description: “When I asked Hina a question, she did not answer and turned away.”

Vague: “This argument is good.”

Behavior description: “This argument cites three examples and addresses two counter-arguments.”

The vague version is criticism (or praise) without basis. The behavior description gives others something to evaluate.

Why behavior description helps discussion

Without it:

  1. Discussions become evaluative without evidence.
  2. Personal attacks replace argument analysis.
  3. Issues remain unclear.

With it:

  1. Specific issues can be addressed.
  2. Personal attacks are reduced.
  3. Discussion stays substantive.

Even when calling out behavior, students should describe. “You interrupted three times” is more useful than “You are rude.”

How to teach behavior description

1. Model it. When you give feedback, describe behaviors. “I noticed you raised your hand twice but did not get called on. Let me make sure to call on you next.”

2. Practice it. When students give vague feedback, ask “Can you describe what you saw or heard?”

3. Reinforce it. When students describe instead of label, recognize it.

Over time, students develop the habit of describing.

Skill 3: Feeling description

Feeling description is articulating one’s own emotions in productive language.

The problem with poor feeling description

“Shut up” is a feeling expression. It says “I am angry.” But it does not communicate productively. It triggers escalation.

Hyperreactive emotional expression damages discussion. Students need to learn productive expression.

Better feeling description

Productive feeling description:

  1. Names the feeling. (“I am getting angry.”)
  2. Describes the trigger without attacking. (“with this way of discussion.”)
  3. Allows resolution. (The other person can adjust.)

Compare:

Unproductive: “Shut up!” (attacks)

Productive: “I’m getting angry because I feel I’m not being heard. Can you let me finish?” (describes feeling and trigger)

The productive version is harder. It requires self-awareness, vocabulary for emotions, and self-control. It also produces better discussion.

Why feeling description helps discussion

Without it:

  1. Strong emotions explode in attacks.
  2. Discussions devolve into arguments.
  3. Relationships are damaged.

With it:

  1. Emotions are expressed without attacking.
  2. Discussions remain civil.
  3. Trust is built.

A class where students learn feeling description has more productive discussions. Even on contentious topics, students manage their emotions.

How to teach feeling description

1. Build emotional vocabulary. Many students lack words for specific emotions. Teach: frustrated, annoyed, hurt, surprised, excited, anxious, etc.

2. Model it yourself. When you have feelings, name them. “I’m a bit frustrated that we have not yet reached a conclusion. Can we focus?”

3. Coach in real time. When students attack, suggest alternatives. “Instead of ‘shut up,’ could you say ‘I feel angry when you keep interrupting’?”

4. Reinforce when used well. When students describe feelings productively, recognize it.

Over time, productive feeling description becomes the norm.

Flashcard
What does productive feeling description look like in a heated discussion?
Tap to reveal
Answer

Name the feeling, describe the trigger, avoid attacking the person

Unproductive: “Shut up!”

Productive: “I am getting angry because I feel I am not being heard. Can you let me finish?”

The productive version names a specific feeling, links it to a specific trigger, and leaves room for the other person to adjust without being attacked.

Skill 4: Impression checking

Impression checking is verifying others’ feelings rather than assuming.

What impression checking is

Impression checking involves:

  1. Noticing others’ apparent feelings (from face, tone, behavior).
  2. Asking to verify rather than assuming.
  3. Adjusting based on what they actually feel.

Examples:

Without impression checking: “He looks angry. I’ll avoid him.”

With impression checking: “You seem upset. Are you?”

Without: “She didn’t smile, so she must hate my idea.”

With: “I notice you didn’t respond. What are you thinking?”

Why impression checking matters

Without impression checking, students assume what others feel. They often assume wrong. They respond to imagined feelings rather than real ones.

With impression checking, students verify. They respond to what others actually feel. Misunderstandings reduce.

Examples in discussion

Discussion situation: A student offers a controversial opinion. Other students go silent.

Without impression checking: The original student concludes “Everyone disagrees with me” and stops contributing.

With impression checking: “You are quiet. What do you think?” Now the silent students respond. They may have been thinking, not necessarily disagreeing.

The check changes the dynamics.

How to teach impression checking

1. Notice others’ nonverbals. Help students observe facial expressions, body language, tone.

2. Practice verifying. “Before you assume, ask. ‘You seem..is that right?’”

3. Allow others to express. Sometimes silent students are thinking. Give them the option to say so.

4. Model it. When you sense student feelings, check rather than assume.

Over time, impression checking becomes natural.

Pop Quiz
What is the difference between behavior description and labeling?

How the four skills work together

The four skills complement each other:

Paraphrasing ensures understanding.

Behavior description keeps discussions specific.

Feeling description manages emotions productively.

Impression checking prevents misunderstandings about others’ states.

Together, they support healthy discussion. Without them, discussion can become confused, evaluative, emotional, and assumption-driven.

A teacher who teaches all four equips students for productive discussion. A teacher who skips any one leaves students vulnerable to that specific failure mode.

When to teach these skills

The skills do not need full lessons before discussion can begin. They can be taught:

Embedded in discussions. When opportunities arise, the teacher coaches: “Let’s paraphrase Aleem’s idea before responding.”

In mini-lessons. Brief lessons (10-15 minutes) on one skill before a discussion.

As a unit. A focused unit on communication skills (perhaps in a language class) covers all four.

Through reflection. After discussions, reflect on what skills helped or were missing.

Different timing suits different contexts. The skills can be built up over a year of discussions.

Flashcard
What are the four communication skills that improve classroom discussion?
Tap to reveal
Answer

Paraphrasing, behavior description, feeling description, impression checking

  1. Paraphrasing: restating what someone said to verify understanding.

  2. Behavior description: stating observable actions instead of labels.

  3. Feeling description: articulating emotions productively.

  4. Impression checking: verifying others’ feelings rather than assuming.

A discussion classroom where students use all four has fewer misunderstandings, less escalation, and deeper exchanges.

What teachers should plan

To build communication skills in discussion:

  1. Identify the skill students most need. Maybe paraphrasing. Maybe feeling description. Start there.

  2. Plan explicit teaching. A mini-lesson or a coaching opportunity.

  3. Practice in low-stakes contexts. Simple discussions where students can practice without pressure.

  4. Coach in real time. Catch opportunities during discussion.

  5. Reinforce successes. Recognize when students use the skills well.

  6. Build over time. All four skills do not develop in a week. Plan for a semester or year of growth.

A teacher who invests in communication skills sees dramatic improvements in discussion. A teacher who skips them produces discussions that often falter.

Pop Quiz
A student says 'This food is very good.' Another student wants to paraphrase. What might they say?
Last updated on • Talha