Levels and Skills of Management
Levels of Management
- Top managers. Set the direction. Own the strategy and the overall results.
- Middle managers. Translate strategy into department-level plans. Coordinate across teams.
- First-line managers. Supervise the daily work of those who deliver the service.
Managerial Skills Needed
- Conceptual skills. The ability to analyse and diagnose a situation and distinguish cause from effect. Most needed at the top.
- Human skills. The ability to understand, alter, lead, and control the behaviour of other people and groups. Needed at every level.
- Technical skills. Knowledge of the specific work being done. Most needed at the front line.
A school does not manage itself. Different levels of the building need different kinds of management. The principal who acts like a class teacher is missing the strategic work only she can do. The grade coordinator who acts like a principal is overreaching. Knowing which level of management one is doing, and which skill set the level needs, is one of the unspoken expectations on any school leader.
Three levels of management
The handout uses the standard three-level model that applies in most organisations.
| Level | Time horizon | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Top managers | Years | Direction, strategy, external relations |
| Middle managers | Months | Translating strategy into departmental work |
| First-line managers | Days and weeks | Daily supervision of those who do the work |
In a Pakistani school, the levels usually look like this:
- Top. The principal, the owner, the head of school. Sometimes a board of trustees.
- Middle. Deputy heads, heads of section (primary, secondary, sixth form), curriculum coordinators.
- First-line. Grade-level coordinators, subject heads, lead teachers with formal supervisory responsibility.
A teacher, however senior, is not a first-line manager unless she has formal supervisory responsibility for the work of others. A senior teacher who informally mentors juniors is a leader, but not a first-line manager.
What each level actually does
The four functions run at every level, but they look different.
Top managers
Top managers run the school as a whole. Their work is mostly planning and controlling, with light involvement in leading and organising at the highest level.
- Planning. Sets the multi-year direction. Decides whether the school should add a sixth form, launch a new branch, or shift its focus.
- Organising. Restructures the school. Approves senior hires. Owns the budget at the school level.
- Leading. Communicates the vision to the staff and the parents. Sets the climate.
- Controlling. Reviews school-level metrics: enrolment, board results, parent satisfaction, financial health.
A top manager who is constantly in classrooms managing daily incidents is not doing her job; she is doing the deputy’s job and leaving her own undone.
Middle managers
Middle managers translate the top’s direction into specific departmental plans. They are the connective tissue.
- Planning. Sets the term-by-term plan for the section or department.
- Organising. Allocates teachers to sections, schedules training, manages departmental budgets.
- Leading. Coaches and motivates teachers. Manages the dynamics inside the department.
- Controlling. Tracks departmental metrics: assessment results, attendance, teacher development.
Middle managers are the layer that schools most often under-invest in. A school with a strong principal and weak heads of section bottlenecks on the principal for everything.
First-line managers
First-line managers supervise the daily delivery of the work. They are closest to the teachers and to the students.
- Planning. Plans the week’s lessons across the grade.
- Organising. Sorts out materials, room assignments, day-to-day scheduling.
- Leading. Supports teachers in handling specific classroom issues, mentors new teachers.
- Controlling. Reviews lesson plans, monitors daily attendance, catches problems quickly.
A first-line manager is often a teacher with reduced teaching load. The role lives close to the chalk face.
The three skills
Robert Katz, in a much-cited 1955 paper, named three skills every manager needs in some mix.
Conceptual skills
The ability to analyse and diagnose a situation and distinguish between cause and effect.
This is abstract thinking applied to the organisation. A principal who can look at a year’s worth of board results and identify which two teaching changes caused the improvement has conceptual skill. A principal who can only say “results went up” has a fact, not an analysis.
Conceptual skill matters most at the top because top managers decide the direction. Bad analysis at the top sends the whole school in the wrong direction. Bad analysis at the front line affects one classroom for one week.
Human skills
The ability to understand, alter, lead, and control the behaviour of other individuals and groups.
Human skills are needed at every level. A first-line manager works with three teachers and forty-five parents; a top manager works with a board, government, parents, the press, and the entire staff. The number of relationships changes; the underlying skill does not.
A manager weak in human skills can do the job badly at any level. A manager strong in human skills can recover from many other weaknesses.
Technical skills
Technical skill is detailed knowledge of the work being done. A grade-3 coordinator needs to know how grade-3 reading is actually taught. A finance manager needs accounting.
Technical skill matters most at the front line, where the manager is supervising specific work. It matters less at the top, where the manager is making strategic decisions and can rely on the technical skills of others.
The shifting mix
The three skills are needed in different proportions at different levels.
| Level | Conceptual | Human | Technical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top | High | High | Lower |
| Middle | Medium-high | High | Medium |
| First-line | Lower | High | High |
Two notes:
- Human skills are high at every level. Management is people work. No level escapes that.
- Conceptual and technical trade off. As a manager rises, she needs more analysis and less hands-on technical detail.
A promoted teacher often struggles with the transition because she keeps relying on the technical skill that got her promoted. The promotion needed more conceptual skill and the same human skill, not more technical skill.
Because higher-level decisions affect more people and have longer consequences.
Conceptual skill is the ability to diagnose a situation and separate cause from effect. At the front line, a bad diagnosis affects one classroom for one week. At the top, a bad diagnosis sends the whole school in the wrong direction for years. Technical skill matters more at the front line because the manager is supervising specific work. Human skill matters at every level because management is people work and no level escapes that.
Why this matters in education
Schools often promote based on technical skill. The best maths teacher becomes head of mathematics. The best grade-3 teacher becomes the primary coordinator. The promotion rewards her past contribution but does not prepare her for the new role.
The skill mix needed at the new level is different. The promoted teacher needs conceptual skill (analysing departmental data, diagnosing why some sections perform worse) and human skill (managing colleagues who were peers a month ago) more than additional technical skill. A school that wants strong middle managers invests in conceptual and human skill training, not in more subject-matter training, for the newly promoted.
How was this article?