The Null Curriculum
The Null Curriculum
What it is
- The options learners cannot reach.
- The perspectives they may never know about or use.
- The concepts and skills left out of their intellectual repertoire.
How it forms
- Decisions to exclude certain topics place them in the null curriculum.
- These exclusions affect the whole curriculum and teaching experience.
Common examples
- Topics like evolution, astronomy, or sex education, where included or left out depends on the school and society.
The most overlooked curriculum is the one that is not there. The null curriculum is made of everything a school chooses to leave out: the topics never raised, the perspectives never shown, the skills never built. It teaches by absence, and what is absent shapes a learner as surely as what is present.
What the null curriculum is
The null curriculum covers three kinds of absence:
- The options learners cannot reach, because the school never opened them.
- The perspectives they may never know about, much less be able to use.
- The concepts and skills that never become part of their intellectual repertoire.
A learner can only think with the tools they have been given. A perspective never shown is a perspective that learner cannot bring to a problem later. In that sense, the gaps in a curriculum quietly set the limits of a learner’s thinking.
How it forms, and why it matters
The null curriculum is not an accident so much as the shadow of every choice. Whenever developers decide to exclude certain topics, those topics land in the null curriculum. Because no curriculum can include everything, a null curriculum always exists; the only question is what ends up in it.
These exclusions are not harmless. The decisions affect the curriculum and the teaching experience as a whole, because leaving a topic out changes what learners can connect, compare, and build on elsewhere. A gap in one place ripples into others.
Common examples of topics that may sit in the null curriculum, depending on the school and the society, include evolution, astronomy, and sex education. Whether these are taught or left out is itself a revealing choice. A topic’s place in the null curriculum often says as much about a society’s values as the explicit curriculum does.
Everything a school leaves out
The options, perspectives, concepts, and skills learners never get the chance to study. Topics land in it through decisions to exclude them, and those gaps shape what learners can later think with.
No school can teach everything, so leaving things out is unavoidable
The goal is not to remove the null curriculum but to make exclusions consciously. A topic left out by careful decision is defensible; one left out by habit may not be.
How was this article?