Conscious Competence and Learning
The four levels of conscious competence
| Level | Awareness | Skill |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Unconsciously unskilled | Unaware | Lacking |
| 2. Consciously unskilled | Aware | Lacking |
| 3. Consciously skilled | Aware | Acquired |
| 4. Unconsciously skilled | Unaware | Mastered |
Two factors the model highlights
Consciousness (awareness) and skill level (competence). The model is sometimes drawn as a matrix, sometimes as a ladder.
Important property
Competence is skill-specific, not a global trait. A teacher carries different skills at different levels, and any skill can return to a lower level when conditions change.
A teacher learning a new skill goes through a predictable sequence of mental states. The conscious competence model names the four stages of this sequence and helps the practitioner locate themselves at any point in the journey.
The four levels
The model describes four levels through which a learner moves as they build competence in a new skill. The two dimensions the model uses are awareness (consciousness) and skill (competence).
Level 1: unconsciously unskilled
At this level, the learner does not know that they do not have the skill, and may not even know that the skill exists. Their confidence often exceeds their abilities, because there is nothing in their awareness telling them they are lacking.
A teacher in their first month who has never been taught about formative assessment may run lessons with no formative assessment at all and feel that the lessons are going fine. They are at level 1 with respect to that skill: blissfully ignorant.
This level is uncomfortable to recognise because it is invisible from the inside. The teacher cannot see what they cannot see. External input is required to move out of it.
Level 2: consciously unskilled
At this level, the learner has discovered that the skill exists and that they do not have it. They realise that others are much more competent than they are, and that those others can do things the learner is struggling with.
This level can be demoralising. Awareness of the gap between current ability and the desired skill produces discomfort. Some learners give up at this stage. The discomfort feels like failure when it is actually progress: the learner has moved from invisible incompetence to visible incompetence.
Staying positive at this stage matters. The discomfort is a signal of growth, not a sign that growth is impossible.
Level 3: consciously skilled
At this level, the learner has acquired the skill and the knowledge they need. They can apply the skill, and as they use it more, they gain confidence.
The skill still requires concentration. The learner has to think about what they are doing as they do it. This is normal at level 3. Performance improves with practice, and the activity becomes increasingly automatic, but it does not feel automatic yet.
A teacher at level 3 in formative assessment can plan and run formative checks deliberately, but they are aware of doing so as a separate, deliberate activity within the lesson.
Level 4: unconsciously skilled
At this level, the learner uses the skill effortlessly and performs tasks without conscious effort. They are completely confident of success.
The skill has become second nature. The teacher integrates formative assessment into lessons without separately thinking about it. It is part of how they teach.
This level is the goal of skill development for most practical skills. It is also the level that creates a particular risk: the practitioner can no longer easily explain how they do what they do, which makes it hard to teach the skill to others.
Two factors the model highlights
The model highlights two factors that affect thinking as a learner builds a new skill: consciousness (awareness) and skill level (competence).
Both factors move during the learning. At level 1 to level 2, awareness rises while skill stays low. At level 2 to level 3, skill rises and awareness stays focused. At level 3 to level 4, skill rises further and awareness drops as the skill becomes automatic.
The two-by-two grid helps make sense of where a teacher is at any moment. It is also drawn sometimes as a ladder, with each level a step up. The matrix and the ladder are the same model in different visual forms.
The teacher can repeat any stage
The model is not a one-way trip. A teacher can repeat any stage given the right circumstances. Teaching a new subject, for example, often returns the teacher to level 1 or 2 with respect to that subject’s specific demands.
This is important to recognise. A teacher who is unconsciously skilled at one thing may be unconsciously unskilled at another. The model applies to specific skills, not to the teacher as a whole. A mature teacher carries some skills at level 4 and is working on others at level 1, 2, or 3.
A teacher who treats their own competence as a single global trait either becomes complacent (assuming everything is at level 4) or discouraged (assuming everything is at level 1). The reflective view is that competence is granular: you are at different levels for different skills.
Knowing the four levels and the two factors gives the teacher a map. Using it to actually move through the levels is the next question, and that takes deliberate tools and time.
1. Unconsciously unskilled, 2. Consciously unskilled, 3. Consciously skilled, 4. Unconsciously skilled.
Awareness rises from level 1 to level 2; skill rises through levels 2 to 4; awareness drops again at level 4 as the skill becomes automatic. The model applies to specific skills, not to a teacher as a whole, so any practitioner carries some skills at level 4 and others at level 1, 2, or 3 at the same time.
How was this article?