The Four Common Tools
The Four Common Tools
- Observation. Watching classroom behavior and recording it. Open (descriptive notes) or structured (checklist or tally).
- Questionnaire. Written questions. Closed items give numbers, open items give opinions.
- Interview. Spoken conversation. Structured, semi-structured, or unstructured.
- Checklist. Prepared list of items or behaviors marked present or absent. Fast and clean.
The Four Common Tools
Most action research uses some combination of these four tools. Each one has strengths and limits. The good researcher picks the right tool for each question and uses two or more in combination.
Observation
Observation is the systematic watching and recording of what happens in a classroom. The researcher pays attention to specific behaviors and writes them down.
There are two flavors.
Open observation. The researcher writes descriptive notes about what is happening. “Three students at the back are talking. Saima asked a question about prime numbers. The lesson started at 8:05, two minutes late.” Open observation is qualitative. It captures texture.
Structured observation. The researcher uses a prepared form, often a checklist or a tally sheet, to record specific behaviors. “Hands raised in response to teacher question: 6.” Structured observation is quantitative. It captures counts.
Strengths. Captures behavior as it actually happens, not as people report it. Catches things students would not mention in an interview.
Limits. The observer’s attention is selective; she will miss things. Students sometimes behave differently when they know they are being watched, a pattern researchers call the Hawthorne effect.
Best for. Behavior, participation, classroom interaction, off-task patterns, teacher-student talk ratios.
Questionnaire
A questionnaire is a written set of questions that students or teachers fill out. The questions can be:
- Closed. Multiple choice, yes/no, or a rating scale (1 to 5). Produces quantitative data.
- Open. Asks for a written response in the student’s own words. Produces qualitative data.
- Mixed. Most real questionnaires have both.
Strengths. Reaches many students quickly. Lets you collect both numbers and opinions. Easy to compare answers across the class.
Limits. Students may not be honest, especially if they think the teacher will see who wrote what. Younger students may not understand the questions. Open-ended responses require time to analyze.
Best for. Self-reported attitudes, opinions about a lesson, ratings of confidence, feedback on a new strategy.
Interview
An interview is a spoken conversation between the researcher and the participant. The aim is to gather deeper opinions, explanations, and insights than a questionnaire can.
Three forms.
- Structured interview. A fixed list of questions, asked in the same order to every student. Allows comparison across students. Limits flexibility.
- Semi-structured interview. A short list of main questions, with freedom to follow up on what the student says. Most common in action research.
- Unstructured interview. An open conversation around a topic. Useful when you do not yet know what to ask.
Strengths. Goes deep. Catches the why behind a behavior or attitude. Surfaces things the researcher did not expect.
Limits. Slow. Students sometimes say what they think the teacher wants to hear. Hard to interview many students in a busy school week.
Best for. Understanding why students struggle, how they feel about a strategy, what they did not understand in a lesson.
Checklist
A checklist is a prepared list of items or behaviors. The researcher works through it and marks each item as present or absent (or sometimes on a scale).
Strengths. Very fast. Easy to use during a live lesson. Produces clean, comparable data. Great for repeated observation over weeks.
Limits. Captures only what is on the list. Misses anything unexpected. Says nothing about why a behavior happened.
Best for. Quick, repeated assessment of specific behaviors. Tracking whether a student demonstrates a list of skills. Lesson observation by a peer.
A sample checklist and a sample questionnaire
You do not need to design tools from scratch. The shapes below can be adapted for most classroom studies.
A short participation checklist, marked daily for one period:
- Arrived on time
- Spoke at least once during whole-class discussion
- Worked with a partner without redirection
- Completed the in-class task
- Asked a question or asked for help
A short student questionnaire, five items on a 1-to-5 scale where 1 is “not at all” and 5 is “very much”:
- I understood what we did today.
- I felt comfortable speaking in class today.
- I felt comfortable speaking to my partner today.
- I am more confident about this topic than I was last week.
- One thing I am still unsure about (open response).
Pilot any tool with three students before you use it on the whole class.
The two written-and-spoken tools sit close together. One more card pins down the difference between them.